how accurate...?
Is taking a baby's temp under the arm? Is it true u should add one degree to it?
Maybe @mom2ing or @captivated can help me with this?
Maybe @mom2ing or @captivated can help me with this?
Comments
They change this all around so much.
But you know, all the hoopla over the addition and subtraction of degrees between axillary, oral, and rectal temperatures has caused most people (parents and doctors alike) to lose perspective on what significance fever has on an illness. Fever is a good thing when it is present and not causing the child to feel miserable. The body develops a fever as a defense mechanism against infection by viruses and bacteria. Therefore, when a child has a fever, he likely has an infection of some type. But fever should not be viewed with alarm. It helps fight this infection and alerts us for other symptoms. So, if the temperature taken axillary reads 101F, does it matter if it is truly 102F or 102.8F? Not really. In either case, the fever should be treated only if the child isn't feeling good because of it.
So, whether you add 1 degree or 1.8 degrees to an underarm temperature, it still remains an inaccurate reading. The precision of the temperature reading is not necessarily as important as how the child is doing while he has the elevated temperature. But, if you are truly concerned about the exact temperature, taking a rectal temperature is the only way to go."
thermometer reading to compensate for how you took your
child’s temperature, regardless of the thermometer’s instruction"
http://www.stclairpediatrics.com/Handouts/Fever in Children.pdf